Granular error reporting on multi-pass programming of non-volatile memory

ABSTRACT

A system includes a memory component to, upon completion of second pass programming in response to a multi-pass programming command, write a plurality of flag bits within a group of memory cells programmed by the multi-pass programming command. The system also includes a processing device, operatively coupled to the memory component. The processing device is to detect an error in attempting to read a top page of the group of memory cells, determine a number of first values within the plurality of flag bits, and in response to the number of first values not satisfying a threshold criterion, report, to a host computing device, an uncorrectable data error due to the top page of the group of memory cells being incompletely programmed.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 15/733,561, filed Aug. 27, 2020 which is a National Stage Entryfor International Application No. PCT/CN2019/102055, filed Aug. 22,2019, each of which is incorporated by reference herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the disclosure relate generally to memory sub-systems,and more specifically, relate to granular error reporting on multi-passprogramming of non-volatile memory.

BACKGROUND

A memory sub-system can be a storage system, a memory module, or ahybrid of a storage device and memory module. The memory sub-system caninclude one or more memory components that store data. The memorycomponents can be, for example, non-volatile memory components andvolatile memory components. In general, a host system can utilize amemory sub-system to store data at the memory components and to retrievedata from the memory components.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure will be understood more fully from the detaileddescription given below and from the accompanying drawings of variousembodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 1A illustrates an example computing environment that includes amemory sub-system in accordance with some embodiments of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 1B is a block diagram of the memory sub-system of FIG. 1A inaccordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2A is a graph that represents states programmed into a group ofmemory cells before and after second pass programming according to someembodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2B is a graph that represents how second pass programming data maybe read out in the event a top page is empty of data according to someembodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an example method to provide granular errorreporting on multi-pass programming of non-volatile memory in accordancewith some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an example method to provide granular errorreporting on multi-pass programming of non-volatile memory in accordancewith other embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an example computer system in whichembodiments of the present disclosure may operate.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to granular and accurateerror reporting on multi-pass programming of non-volatile (NVM) memory.A memory sub-system can be a storage device, a memory module, or ahybrid of a storage device and memory module. Examples of storagedevices and memory modules are described below in conjunction with FIG.1A. In general, a host system can utilize a memory sub-system thatincludes one or more memory components. The host system can provide datato be stored at the memory sub-system and can request data to beretrieved from the memory sub-system.

The memory sub-system can include multiple memory components that canstore data from the host system. Each memory component can include adifferent type of media. Examples of media include, but are not limitedto, a cross-point array of non-volatile memory and flash based memorysuch as single-level cell (SLC) memory, triple-level cell (TLC) memory,and quad-level cell (QLC) memory. The characteristics of different typesof media can be different from one media type to another media type. Oneexample of a characteristic associated with a memory component is datadensity. Data density corresponds to an amount of data (e.g., bits ofdata) that can be stored per memory cell (e.g., NAND memory cell) of amemory component. Using the example of a flash based memory, aquad-level cell (QLC) can store four bits of data while a single-levelcell (SLC) can store one bit of data. Accordingly, a memory componentincluding QLC memory cells will have a higher data density than a memorycomponent including SLC memory cells. While the examples used herein arerelated to QLC memory, the principles and concepts are additionallyapplicable to TLC memory or other multi-level cell memory in additionalembodiments.

In QLC memory, each of a group of memory cells is programmed with fourbits using 16 voltage levels (for 16 states) during multi-passprogramming. In a first pass programming, each of the lower page (LP),upper page (UP), and extra-logical page (XP) are programmed into thegroup of memory cells to complete programming of the first three bits,e.g., eight states each. In a second pass programming, a top page (TP)is programmed to complete programming of the fourth bit, and a total ofeight additional states, in the same physical memory cells.

Conventionally, however, there are circumstances (such as power failure)that cause the second pass programming to fail or not complete eventhough the first pass programming completed and is readable. In thiscase, the first three bits (LP, UP, XP) have been written but not thefourth bit (TP). Compounding the problem is that error-correcting code(ECC) checks, e.g., a low density parity check (LDPC), on the writtendata may still pass. This is because the data read from the supposedlymissing TP is an arithmetic combination of the first three bits (LP, UP,XP) that were written to the same physical locations of the memory cellsduring the first pass programming. Because the data does not exist,e.g., the TP is empty, when a read request is being filled to thatlocation in the NVM memory, a second logical address in the read requestwill not match the logical address stored with data at a physicaladdress of the memory component. This mismatch of addresses triggers amemory controller to detect and report to a host a decoding error, e.g.,an uncorrectable data error. The firmware of the memory controllercannot tell whether this decoding error is real or not. Conventionally,therefore, the memory controller reports the decoding error and stops,causing the software program accessing the memory to hang, causing adeadlock situation. There is no solution but to perform deadlockrecovery, which in some cases requires a restart of the softwareprogram, causing a disruption to the user and lost productivity.

Aspects of the present disclosure address the above and otherdeficiencies by providing additional granularity in error reporting thatgoes beyond reporting a decoding error. By providing detection andreporting of an empty page error in the above-described cases where theTP page is empty, the memory controller may trigger a restart of thewrite operation. The restart of the write operation may cause the hostsystem to resend the data to be programmed properly, e.g., with an eraseand write of the data to the memory component. Thus, reporting adifferent error than a memory decoding error may lead to a morefavorable solution than recovery from a deadlock situation and a hungprogram.

In one embodiment, the memory component may write multiple flag bits(e.g., from a “1” to a “0”) of a flag byte stored in the NVM memory inresponse to completion of second pass programming of the multi-passprogramming. In response to a read request, the memory controller maydetect that a second logical address within the read request does notmatch the logical address associated with a physical address of thegroup of memory cells. The memory controller may then do a check todetermine a number of first values (e.g., ones if the write was of onesto zeros) within the plurality of flag bits. In response to the numberof first values not satisfying a threshold criterion, the memorycontroller may report, to a host computing device, an uncorrectable dataerror because the TP is not empty. The threshold criterion may be thatthe number of first values are greater than or equal to approximatelyfifty percent of a number of the plurality of flag bits. If, however,the number of first values meets this threshold criterion, then the flagbits were not set upon the second pass programming and the TP is empty.In this situation, the memory controller may report an empty page error.

In an additional or alternative embodiment, particularly where the abovedetection results in an empty page error, the memory controller may sumfirst data of a first pass programming to generate combined data (e.g.,LP+UP+XP). The memory controller may further calculate a second valuevia execution of an arithmetic operation over the combined data, e.g.,resulting in (LP+UP+XP) modulo 2 in one embodiment. The memorycontroller may then generate a difference value via comparison of thesecond value with a third value of second data of a second passprogramming (e.g., of the TP). The memory controller may report, to ahost computing device, an empty page error in response to the differencevalue satisfying a threshold criterion, e.g., being less than betweenfive and fifteen percent of a number of bits of the second value.Otherwise, if the difference value does not satisfy this thresholdcriterion, the memory controller may report an uncorrectable data errorto the host computing device.

FIG. 1A illustrates an example computing environment 100 that includes amemory sub-system 110 in accordance with some embodiments of the presentdisclosure. The memory sub-system 110 can include media, such as memorycomponents 112A to 112N. The memory components 112A to 112N can bevolatile memory components, non-volatile memory components, or acombination of such. A memory sub-system 110 can be a storage device, amemory module, or a hybrid of a storage device and memory module.Examples of a storage device include a solid-state drive (SSD), a flashdrive, a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive, an embedded Multi-MediaController (eMMC) drive, a Universal Flash Storage (UFS) drive, and ahard disk drive (HDD). Examples of memory modules include a dual in-linememory module (DIMM), a small outline DIMM (SO-DIMM), and a non-volatiledual in-line memory module (NVDIMM).

The computing environment 100 can include a host system 120 that iscoupled to one or more memory sub-systems 110. In some embodiments, thehost system 120 is coupled to different types of memory sub-system 110.FIG. 1A illustrates one example of a host system 120 coupled to onememory sub-system 110. The host system 120 uses the memory sub-system110, for example, to write data to the memory sub-system 110 and readdata from the memory sub-system 110. As used herein, “coupled to”generally refers to a connection between components, which can be anindirect communicative connection or direct communicative connection(e.g., without intervening components), whether wired or wireless,including connections such as electrical, optical, magnetic, etc.

The host system 120 can be a computing device such as a desktopcomputer, laptop computer, network server, mobile device, or suchcomputing device that includes a memory and a processing device. Thehost system 120 can include or be coupled to the memory sub-system 110so that the host system 120 can read data from or write data to thememory sub-system 110. The host system 120 can be coupled to the memorysub-system 110 via a physical host interface. As used herein, “coupledto” generally refers to a connection between components, which can be anindirect communicative connection or direct communicative connection(e.g., without intervening components), whether wired or wireless,including connections such as electrical, optical, magnetic, etc.Examples of a physical host interface include, but are not limited to, aserial advanced technology attachment (SATA) interface, a peripheralcomponent interconnect express (PCIe) interface, universal serial bus(USB) interface, Fibre Channel, Serial Attached SCSI (SAS), etc. Thephysical host interface can be used to transmit data between the hostsystem 120 and the memory sub-system 110. The host system 120 canfurther utilize an NVM Express (NVMe) interface to access the memorycomponents 112A to 112N when the memory sub-system 110 is coupled withthe host system 120 by the PCIe interface. The physical host interfacecan provide an interface for passing control, address, data, and othersignals between the memory sub-system 110 and the host system 120.

The memory components 112A to 112N can include any combination of thedifferent types of non-volatile memory components and/or volatile memorycomponents. An example of non-volatile memory components includes anegative-and (NAND) type flash memory. Each of the memory components112A to 112N can include one or more arrays of memory cells (e.g., NANDmemory cells) such as single level cells (SLCs) or multi-level cells(MLCs) (e.g., triple level cells (TLCs) or quad-level cells (QLCs)). Insome embodiments, a particular memory component can include both an SLCportion and a MLC portion of memory cells. Each of the memory cells canstore one or more bits of data (e.g., data blocks) used by the hostsystem 120. Although non-volatile memory components such as NAND typeflash memory are described, the memory components 112A to 112N can bebased on any other type of memory such as a volatile memory. In someembodiments, the memory components 112A to 112N can be, but are notlimited to, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), dynamicrandom access memory (DRAM), synchronous dynamic random access memory(SDRAM), phase change memory (PCM), magneto random access memory (MRAM),negative-or (NOR) flash memory, electrically erasable programmableread-only memory (EEPROM), and a cross-point array of non-volatilememory cells. A cross-point array of non-volatile memory can perform bitstorage based on a change of bulk resistance, in conjunction with astackable cross-gridded data access array. Additionally, in contrast tomany flash-based memories, cross-point non-volatile memory can perform awrite in-place operation, where a non-volatile memory cell can beprogrammed without the non-volatile memory cell being previously erased.Furthermore, the memory cells of the memory components 112A to 112N canbe grouped as memory pages or data blocks that can refer to a unit ofthe memory component used to store data.

The memory system controller 115 (hereinafter referred to as“controller”) can communicate with the memory components 112A to 112N toperform operations such as reading data, writing data, or erasing dataat the memory components 112A to 112N and other such operations. Thecontroller 115 can include hardware such as one or more integratedcircuits and/or discrete components, a buffer memory, or a combinationthereof. The controller 115 can be a microcontroller, special purposelogic circuitry (e.g., a field programmable gate array (FPGA), anapplication specific integrated circuit (ASIC), etc.), or other suitableprocessor. The controller 115 can include a processor (processingdevice) 117 configured to execute instructions stored in local memory119. In the illustrated example, the local memory 119 of the controller115 includes an embedded memory configured to store instructions forperforming various processes, operations, logic flows, and routines thatcontrol operation of the memory sub-system 110, including handlingcommunications between the memory sub-system 110 and the host system120. In some embodiments, the local memory 119 can include memoryregisters storing memory pointers, fetched data, etc. The local memory119 can also include read-only memory (ROM) for storing micro-code.While the example memory sub-system 110 in FIG. 1 has been illustratedas including the controller 115, in another embodiment of the presentdisclosure, a memory sub-system 110 cannot include a controller 115, andmay instead rely upon external control (e.g., provided by an externalhost, or by a processor or controller separate from the memorysub-system).

In general, the controller 115 can receive commands or operations fromthe host system 120 and can convert the commands or operations intoinstructions or appropriate commands to achieve the desired access tothe memory components 112A to 112N. The controller 115 can beresponsible for other operations such as wear leveling operations,garbage collection operations, error detection and error-correcting code(ECC) operations, encryption operations, caching operations, and addresstranslations between a logical block address and a physical blockaddress that are associated with the memory components 112A to 112N. Thecontroller 115 can further include host interface circuitry tocommunicate with the host system 120 via the physical host interface.The host interface circuitry can convert the commands received from thehost system into command instructions to access the memory components112A to 112N as well as convert responses associated with the memorycomponents 112A to 112N into information for the host system 120.

The memory sub-system 110 can also include additional circuitry orcomponents that are not illustrated. In some embodiments, the memorysub-system 110 can include a cache or buffer (e.g., DRAM) and addresscircuitry (e.g., a row decoder and a column decoder) that can receive anaddress from the controller 115 and decode the address to access thememory components 112A to 112N.

The memory sub-system 110 includes an error determining component 113that can be used for granular and accurate error reporting on multi-passprogramming of non-volatile (NVM) memory as disclosed herein. In someembodiments, the controller 115 includes at least a portion of the errordetermining component 113. For example, the controller 115 can include aprocessor 117 (processing device) configured to execute instructionsstored in local memory 119 for performing the operations describedherein. In some embodiments, the error determining component 113 is partof the host system 120, an application, or an operating system.

The error determining component 113 can receive or detect errorsassociated with memory components 112A to 112N of the memory sub-system110, and which errors can be at the granularity of one or more datablocks, e.g., a group of memory cells. The error determining component113 can, in response to verifying a particular threshold criterion whena logical address within a read request does not match a logical addressstored with data at a physical address in a memory component, report anerror to the host system 120 of a particular granularity. For example,the error may be an empty page error, e.g., the TP of the second passprogramming is empty, or an uncorrectable page error, e.g., there hasbeen a true decoding error. Further details with regards to theoperations of the error determining component 113 are described below.

As discussed previously, in QLC memory, each of a group of memory cellsis programmed with four bits using 16 voltage levels (for 16 states)during multi-pass programming, as illustrated in FIG. 2A. In a firstpass programming, each of the lower page (LP), upper page (UP), andextra-logical page (XP) are programmed into the group of memory cells tocomplete programming of the first three bits, e.g., eight states each.In a second pass programming, a top page (TP) is programmed to completeprogramming of the fourth bit, and a total of eight additional states,in the same physical memory cells. By programming the group of states atdifferent voltage levels in two different passes of programming, it isless likely that neighboring states—which are getting ever closer toeach other with shrinking NAND memory—will be disturbed or programmedincorrectly, e.g., due to a coupling drag effect between voltage states.Accordingly, multi-pass programming of non-volatile memory reduces thenumber of write errors.

Conventionally, however, there are circumstances that cause the secondpass programming to fail or not complete even though the first passprogramming completed and is readable. The most common situation thatmay cause this situation is where the first pass programming completesbut a power failure (or other write-related error) causes the secondpass programming to not complete. In this case, the first three bits(LP, UP, XP) have been written but not the fourth bit (TP). Compoundingthe problem is that error-correcting code (ECC) checks, e.g., a lowdensity parity check (LDPC), on the written data may still pass. This isbecause the data read from the supposedly missing TP is an arithmeticcombination of the first three bits (LP, UP, XP) that were written tothe same physical locations of the memory cells during the first passprogramming. In one embodiment, that arithmetic combination is(LP+UP+XP) modulo two (“2”), although other combinations are envisioned.The ECC check of (LP+UP+XP) passes the same as does the ECC check of(LP+UP+XP) modulo 2 in conventional LDPC engines. In this way, althoughthe ECC check of the write operation passes, the data is incomplete andwill result in an error when a controller tries to read that data aswill be explained in detail.

More specifically, FIG. 2B is a graph that represents how second passprogramming, e.g., TP data, may be read out in the event the top page isempty of data according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.In the case of deep error handling firmware of the memory controller mayadjust read levels down by about 300 millivolts. As illustrated, thedata read out during a TP read where the TP data is empty includes readsat RL1, RL3, RL5, RL7, RL9, RL11, RL13, and RL15, where “RL” stands for“read level.” The memory component may thus automatically assign TP datafor the cells between reads based on the 16-state gray codingillustrated in Table 1, which is consistent with an arithmeticcombination of the LP, UP, and XP data. For example, in one embodiment,TP′=(LP+UP+XP) modulo 2, where LP+UP+XP may be determined as a logicalOR operation.

TABLE 1 8-State XP Bit 8-State UP Bit 8-State LP Bit TP′ (Read Out As:)1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0

In various embodiments, because the data does not exist, e.g., the TP isempty, and so the data and associated logical address do not exist eventhough the data actually read out can pass the ECC check. Accordingly,when a read request is being filled to that location in the NVM memory,a second logical address in the read request will not match the logicaladdress associated with data stored at a physical address of the memorycomponent, e.g., because the logical address of the TP does not exist.This mismatch of addresses triggers a memory controller (e.g.,processing device) to detect (and report to a host) a decoding error,e.g., an uncorrectable data error. The firmware of the memory controllercannot tell whether this decoding error is real or not. Conventionally,therefore, the memory controller reports the decoding error and stops,causing the software program accessing the memory to hang. A softwarehang up may be the same result in response to a deadlock situation,e.g., where the memory controller is waiting for another process tofinish its hold on the memory location while that process is waiting onthe memory controller to finish its access. There is no solution but toperform deadlock recovery, which in some cases requires a restart of thesoftware program, causing a disruption to the user and lostproductivity. However, because the case of an empty TP is not a truedecoding error, reporting it as such is incorrect and may lead to theworst-case scenario of hung software program(s).

FIG. 1B is a block diagram of the memory sub-system 110 of FIG. 1A inaccordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. Inembodiments, the memory sub-system 110 includes the controller 115coupled to the memory component 112A, which is depicted as exemplary ofany of the memory components 112A to 112N. The memory component 112A caninclude a local media controller 130, a flag byte 140 (e.g., storedwithin the memory cells), and a ROM block 150. In one embodiment, theflag byte 140 is a TP PROGRAMMED FLAG byte in the LP data of a group ofmemory cells. The local media controller 130 can couple the controller115, the ROM block 150, and the flag byte 140 together as illustrated.In one embodiment, the local media controller 130 is to executeoperations received from the controller 115 on one or more memory cellsof the memory component 112A.

In one embodiment, the local media controller 130 is coupled to thecontroller 115 via an open NAND flash interface (ONFI) 125, which is thecommunication interface between the controller 115 and the memorycomponent 112A when the controller 115 is an SSD controller and thememory component 112A is a NAND component of memory. Further, in someembodiments, the local media controller 130 is a microcontroller thatincludes a hardware state machine that translates commands from the ONFIinterface (as sent by the controller 115) to access the memory cells.For example, the local media controller 130 can include control logicembodied as the state machine that can be generally unchangeable andthat follows the commands or operations as directed by the controller115. In the present disclosure, the state machine of the local mediacontroller 130 is further adapted to interface with one or both of theROM block 150 and flag byte 140 in addition to the memory cells.

In various embodiments, the flag byte 140 includes multiple flag bits142 (e.g., 48 bits) some of which are written upon successful completionof a corresponding group of memory cells. Thus, there may be a flag byte140 for each block of memory in the memory component 112A, each of whichis not illustrated for purposes of simplicity of explanation. Inresponse to a multi-pass programming command, the controller 115 mayperform a multi-pass write to the group of memory cells. Assuming thesecond pass programming completes, the local media controller 130 canrecord such completion by writing to a number of the flag bits 142 inthe flag byte 140. In one embodiment, the flag bits 142 all start as one(“1”) values and, upon completion of the second pass programming of theTP, the local media controller 130 may write zero (“0”) values into halfor over half of the flag bits 142. In another embodiments, the flag bits142 start as zero (“0”) values and the local media controller 130 maywrite one (“1”) values into half or over half the flag bits 142 inresponse to completion of the second pass programming. In this way, athreshold criterion of an empty page may be when a number of firstvalues (whether ones in the first embodiment or zeros in the secondembodiment) of the flag bits 142 is greater than a certain thresholdvalue such as fifty percent of the flag bits 142 (e.g., 24 bits). Inother words, over fifty percent of the flag bits remaining as the firstvalue is indicative that actual data never completed being writtenduring the second pass programming, and thus should be reported as anempty page error.

With additional reference to FIG. 1B, the ROM block 150 can be a portionof the memory cells of the memory component 112A, just reserved forsystem use as ROM in one embodiment. The ROM block 150 can contain afixed data structure of configuration parameters for NAND deviceoperation. In embodiments, the ROM block 150 may include a lookup table152. When a write command is fulfilled and data is written to a block ofmemory cells, the local media controller 130 may update the lookup table152 to create a mapping between the logical address in the write commandand the physical address in the memory component 112A at which the datawas written, e.g., a NAND location. Thus the lookup table 152 isvariably referred to as a logical-to-physical address mapping table.

In embodiments, when a read request is later received that includes asecond logical address, the local media controller 130 may access thelookup table 152 and determine the physical address in the memorycomponent 112A. Assume the second logical address matches the logicaladdress of the previous write command. The local media controller 130may then retrieve, from a location in the memory component 112Acorresponding to the physical address, the data and logical address thathad been previously written. If this logical address (retrieved from theNAND location) does not match the second logical address in the readrequest, the controller 115 detects an error and reports that error tothe host system 120. Conventionally, that error was a decoding error,e.g., an uncorrectable data error. But, as discussed, in cases where theerror is actually due to an empty TP due to incomplete second passprogramming, the controller 115 may report an empty page error to thehost system 120, as will be discussed in more detail with reference toFIGS. 3-4 .

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an example method 300 to provide granularerror reporting on multi-pass programming of non-volatile memory inaccordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The method300 can be performed by processing logic that can include hardware(e.g., processing device, circuitry, dedicated logic, programmablelogic, microcode, hardware of a device, integrated circuit, etc.),software (e.g., instructions run or executed on a processing device), ora combination thereof. In some embodiments, the method 300 is performedby the controller 115 (e.g., the error determining component 113) and/orthe local media controller 130 of FIGS. 1A-1B. Although shown in aparticular sequence or order, unless otherwise specified, the order ofthe processes can be modified. Thus, the illustrated embodiments shouldbe understood only as examples, and the illustrated processes can beperformed in a different order, and some processes can be performed inparallel. Additionally, one or more processes can be omitted in variousembodiments. Thus, not all processes are required in every embodiment.Other process flows are possible.

At operation 310, a memory component writes multiple flag bits within agroup of memory cells in response to completion of second passprogramming (e.g., of the TP) of the group of memory cells. As discussedabove, these multiple flag bits may start as one values (“1s”) and bechanged to zero values (“0s”) when written (or vice versa). If thesecond pass programming completed, it may write zero values to at orover fifty percent of the multiple bits, for example, or at or oversixty percent, or some other percentage depending on how many of thebits are written upon completion of the second pass programming. Atoperation 320, the processing logic may, upon receipt of a read request,determine that a second logical address of the read request does notmatch the logical address associated with data stored at a physicaladdress of the group of memory cells. This determination conventionallyresulted in a decoding error, e.g., an uncorrectable data error.Instead, however, the method 300 may perform additional diagnosis of theerror to determine whether or not the error is due to an empty TP.

With additional reference to FIG. 3 , at operation 330, the processinglogic may determine a number of first values within the multiple flagbits, e.g., the number of one values (“1s”) in the first embodimentdiscussed previously. For example, if the number of one values is overfifty percent of the multiple flag bits, then the second passprogramming did not complete and an empty page error is the appropriateerror to report. At operation 340, the processing logic may determinewhether the number of first values satisfies a threshold criterion,e.g., being greater than or equal to approximately fifty percent of anumber of the multiple flag bits. At operation 350, in response to thenumber of first values not satisfying the threshold criterion (e.g., theflag bits being less than fifty percent ones), the processing logic mayreport, to a host computing device, an uncorrectable data error, e.g.,due to the fact that the number of flag bits indicate the second passprogramming completed. At operation 360, in response to the number offirst values satisfying the threshold criterion (e.g., the flag bitsbeing greater than or equal to fifty percent ones), the processing logicmay report, to the host computing device, an empty page error, e.g.,that the top page programmed during the second pass programming isempty.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an example method 400 to provide granularerror reporting on multi-pass programming of non-volatile memory inaccordance with other embodiments of the present disclosure. The method400 can be performed by processing logic that can include hardware(e.g., processing device, circuitry, dedicated logic, programmablelogic, microcode, hardware of a device, integrated circuit, etc.),software (e.g., instructions run or executed on a processing device), ora combination thereof. In some embodiments, the method 400 is performedby the controller 115 (e.g., the error determining component 113) and/orthe local media controller 130 of FIGS. 1A-1B. Although shown in aparticular sequence or order, unless otherwise specified, the order ofthe processes can be modified. Thus, the illustrated embodiments shouldbe understood only as examples, and the illustrated processes can beperformed in a different order, and some processes can be performed inparallel. Additionally, one or more processes can be omitted in variousembodiments. Thus, not all processes are required in every embodiment.Other process flows are possible.

At operation 410, the processing logic may perform, in response to awrite request with a logical address, multi-pass programming of a groupof memory cells. At operation 420, upon receipt of a read request, theprocessing logic may determine that a second logical address within theread request does not match the logical address associated with datastored at a physical address of the group of memory cells. Thisdetermination conventionally resulted in a decoding error, e.g., anuncorrectable data error. Instead, however, the method 400 may performadditional diagnosis of the error to determine whether or not the erroris due to an empty TP. The method 400 may be an additional oralternative embodiment to the method 300 of FIG. 3 to provide moregranular error reporting in response to a mismatch in logical addresses.

At operation 430, the processing logic may sum first data of a firstpass programming to generate combined data, e.g., of where the firstdata includes sub-portions of data for each of a lower page (LP), for anupper page (UP), and for an extra page (XP). The sum of the first datamay be performed via a logical OR operation, for example. At operation440, the processing logic may further generate (or calculate) a firstvalue via execution of an arithmetic operation over the combined data.In one embodiment, the arithmetic operation is modulo N, thus the firstvalue may be (LP+UP+XP) modulo N (where N is 2, 4, 6 or the like), orthe result of some other arithmetic operation over the combination ofthe first data. At operation 450, the processing logic may generate adifference value via comparison of the first value with a second valueof second data of a second pass programming. For example, the secondvalue may be the data read out from an address corresponding to secondpass programming for the logical address. As discussed previously, whenthe TP is empty, the second data read out may be the same as or similarto an arithmetic combination of the first data, e.g., a combination ofLP+UP+XP. In one embodiment, the determination of the difference valuemay be performed with use of an XOR operation, for example.

With continued reference to FIG. 4 , at operation 460, the processinglogic may determine whether the difference value satisfies a thresholdcriterion, e.g., being less than between five and fifteen percent of anumber of bits of the first value. In one embodiment, this thresholdcriterion may be between 500-700 bits, for example. This thresholdcriterion may be chosen because the second data should be approximatelythe same as the arithmetic operation over the combined first data whenthe top page is empty. As discussed above, what is therefore read out asthe second data when the TP is empty may be approximately the same as(LP+UP+XP) modulo 2 in one embodiment. At operation 470, in response tothe difference value not satisfying the threshold criterion, theprocessing logic may report an uncorrectable data error to the hostcomputing device, e.g., that a real decoding error has occurred becausethe arithmetic has verified the top page is not empty. At operation 480,in response to the difference value satisfying the threshold criterion,the processing logic may report an empty page error, e.g., the top pageprogrammed during second pass programming is empty.

The method 400 may be provided as an alternative to method 300, or maybe provided as a confirmation check to the method 300 of FIG. 3 . If asa confirmation check, the method 400 may be performed after the method300 results in an empty page error, e.g., to confirm it is an empty pageerror before reporting the error to the host system 120. Thisdouble-check approach may be advantageous as the method 300 may beperformed quickly with a single read of the multiple flag bits 142 todetermine whether the second pass programming has completed. But,because the flag bits 142 are also submit to write errors, aconfirmation check of method 400 may provide an ability to ensure thetop page is empty before reporting the error as an empty page. Theadditional data reads and arithmetic steps of method 400 are moreresource intensive than method 300, but would be worth the effort anyadditional latency to ensure the correct error is reported and that thecorrect action taken in response to that error.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example machine of a computer system 500 withinwhich a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any oneor more of the methodologies discussed herein, can be executed. In someembodiments, the computer system 500 can correspond to a host system(e.g., the host system 120 of FIG. 1A) that includes, is coupled to, orutilizes a memory sub-system (e.g., the memory sub-system 110 of FIGS.1A-1B) or can be used to perform the operations of a controller 115(e.g., to execute an operating system to perform operationscorresponding to the error determining component 113 of FIG. 1A). Inalternative embodiments, the machine can be connected (e.g., networked)to other machines in a LAN, an intranet, an extranet, and/or theInternet. The machine can operate in the capacity of a server or aclient machine in client-server network environment, as a peer machinein a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment, or as a serveror a client machine in a cloud computing infrastructure or environment.

The machine can be a personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a set-top box(STB), a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a webappliance, a server, a network router, a switch or bridge, or anymachine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential orotherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine. Further,while a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also betaken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointlyexecute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one ormore of the methodologies discussed herein.

The example computer system 500 includes a processing device 502, a mainmemory 504 (e.g., read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, dynamic randomaccess memory (DRAM) such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) or Rambus DRAM(RDRAM), etc.), a static memory 506 (e.g., flash memory, static randomaccess memory (SRAM), etc.), and a data storage system 518, whichcommunicate with each other via a bus 530.

Processing device 502 represents one or more general-purpose processingdevices such as a microprocessor, a central processing unit, or thelike. More particularly, the processing device can be a complexinstruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, reduced instruction setcomputing (RISC) microprocessor, very long instruction word (VLIW)microprocessor, or a processor implementing other instruction sets, orprocessors implementing a combination of instruction sets. Processingdevice 502 can also be one or more special-purpose processing devicessuch as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a fieldprogrammable gate array (FPGA), a digital signal processor (DSP),network processor, or the like. The processing device 502 is configuredto execute instructions 526 for performing the operations and stepsdiscussed herein. The computer system 500 can further include a networkinterface device 508 to communicate over the network 520.

The data storage system 518 can include a machine-readable storagemedium 524 (also known as a computer-readable medium) on which is storedone or more sets of instructions 526 or software embodying any one ormore of the methodologies or functions described herein. Theinstructions 526 can also reside, completely or at least partially,within the main memory 504 and/or within the processing device 502during execution thereof by the computer system 500, the main memory 504and the processing device 502 also constituting machine-readable storagemedia. The machine-readable storage medium 524, data storage system 518,and/or main memory 504 can correspond to the memory sub-system 110 ofFIGS. 1A-1B.

In one embodiment, the instructions 526 include instructions toimplement functionality corresponding to an error determining component(e.g., the error determining component 113 of FIG. 1A) or firmware ofthe local media controller 130. While the machine-readable storagemedium 524 is shown in an example embodiment to be a single medium, theterm “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include asingle medium or multiple media that store the one or more sets ofinstructions. The term “machine-readable storage medium” shall also betaken to include any medium that is capable of storing or encoding a setof instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machineto perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presentdisclosure. The term “machine-readable storage medium” shall accordinglybe taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories,optical media, and magnetic media.

Some portions of the preceding detailed descriptions have been presentedin terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations ondata bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions andrepresentations are the ways used by those skilled in the dataprocessing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their workto others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally,conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of operations leading to adesired result. The operations are those requiring physicalmanipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily,these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capableof being stored, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It hasproven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, torefer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters,terms, numbers, or the like.

It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar termsare to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and aremerely convenient labels applied to these quantities. The presentdisclosure can refer to the action and processes of a computer system,or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transformsdata represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computersystem's registers and memories into other data similarly represented asphysical quantities within the computer system memories or registers orother such information storage systems.

The present disclosure also relates to an apparatus for performing theoperations herein. This apparatus can be specially constructed for theintended purposes, or it can include a general purpose computerselectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored inthe computer. Such a computer program can be stored in a computerreadable storage medium, such as, but not limited to, any type of diskincluding floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-opticaldisks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs,EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable forstoring electronic instructions, each coupled to a computer system bus.

The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently relatedto any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general purposesystems can be used with programs in accordance with the teachingsherein, or it can prove convenient to construct a more specializedapparatus to perform the method. The structure for a variety of thesesystems will appear as set forth in the description below. In addition,the present disclosure is not described with reference to any particularprogramming language. It will be appreciated that a variety ofprogramming languages can be used to implement the teachings of thedisclosure as described herein.

The present disclosure can be provided as a computer program product, orsoftware, that can include a machine-readable medium having storedthereon instructions, which can be used to program a computer system (orother electronic devices) to perform a process according to the presentdisclosure. A machine-readable medium includes any mechanism for storinginformation in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer). In someembodiments, a machine-readable (e.g., computer-readable) mediumincludes a machine (e.g., a computer) readable storage medium such as aread only memory (“ROM”), random access memory (“RAM”), magnetic diskstorage media, optical storage media, flash memory components, etc.

In the foregoing specification, embodiments of the disclosure have beendescribed with reference to specific example embodiments thereof. Itwill be evident that various modifications can be made thereto withoutdeparting from the broader spirit and scope of embodiments of thedisclosure as set forth in the following claims. The specification anddrawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative senserather than a restrictive sense.

1. A system comprising: a memory component to, upon completion of secondpass programming in response to a multi-pass programming command, writea plurality of flag bits within a group of memory cells programmed bythe multi-pass programming command; and a processing device, operativelycoupled to the memory component, the processing device to performoperations comprising: detecting an error in attempting to read a toppage of the group of memory cells; determining a number of first valueswithin the plurality of flag bits; and in response to the number offirst values not satisfying a threshold criterion, reporting, to a hostcomputing device, an uncorrectable data error due to the top page of thegroup of memory cells being incompletely programmed.
 2. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the threshold criterion comprises being greater than orequal to fifty percent of a number of the plurality of flag bits.
 3. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein, in response to the number of first valuessatisfying the threshold criterion, the operations further comprisereporting, to the host computing device, an empty page error that isindicative of the top page being without data.
 4. The system of claim 1,wherein, in response to the number of first values satisfying thethreshold criterion, the operations further comprise: combining firstdata of a first pass programming to generate combined data; generating asecond value that comprises an arithmetic operation over the combineddata; generating a difference value via comparison of the second valuewith a third value of second data of the second pass programming; andreporting, to the host computing device, an empty page error in responseto the difference value satisfying a second threshold criterion.
 5. Thesystem of claim 4, wherein the arithmetic operation comprises modulotwo.
 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the operations further comprise,in response to the difference value being greater than or equal to thesecond threshold criterion, reporting the uncorrectable data error tothe host computing device.
 7. The system of claim 4, wherein the firstdata comprises a sub-portion of data for each of a lower page (LP), foran upper page (UP), and for an extra page (XP), and the second datacomprises data of the top page (TP) programmed during the second passprogramming.
 8. The system of claim 4, wherein the second thresholdcriterion comprises being less than between five and fifteen percent ofa number of bits of the second value.
 9. A method comprising:performing, in response to a write request with a logical address,multi-pass programming of a group of memory cells of a memory component;writing, in response to completion of second pass programming of themulti-pass programming, a plurality of flag bits within the group ofmemory cells; detecting an error in attempting to read a top page of thegroup of memory cells; determining a number of first values within theplurality of flag bits; and in response to the number of first valuessatisfying a threshold criterion, reporting, to a host computing device,an empty page error that is indicative of the top page beingincompletely programmed during the second pass programming.
 10. Themethod of claim 9, wherein the threshold criterion comprises beinggreater than or equal to fifty percent of a number of the plurality offlag bits, the method further comprising, in response to the number offirst values not satisfying the threshold criterion, reporting, to thehost computing device, an uncorrectable data error.
 11. The method ofclaim 9, further comprising, before reporting the empty page error,confirming that the top page is empty by: combining first data of afirst pass programming to generate combined data; generating a secondvalue via executing an arithmetic operation over the combined data;generating a difference value via comparison of the second value with athird value of second data programmed in the top page; and determiningthat the difference value does not satisfy a second threshold criterion.12. The method of claim 11, wherein executing the arithmetic operationcomprises calculating modulo two of the combined data.
 13. The method ofclaim 11, further comprising, in response to determining the differencevalue satisfies the second threshold criterion, reporting anuncorrectable data error to the host computing device.
 14. The method ofclaim 11, wherein the second threshold criterion comprises being lessthan between five and fifteen percent of a number of bits of the secondvalue.
 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the first data comprises asub-portion of data for each of a lower page (LP), for an upper page(UP), and for an extra page (XP).
 16. A system comprising: a memorycomponent; and a processing device, operatively coupled to the memorycomponent, the processing device to perform operations comprising:performing, in response to a write request comprising a logical address,multi-pass programming of a group of memory cells of the memorycomponent; detecting an error in attempting to read a top page of thegroup of memory cells; and in response to the detecting: summing firstdata of a first pass programming to generate combined data; generating afirst value via execution of an arithmetic operation over the combineddata; generating a difference value via comparison of the first valuewith a second value of second data of a second pass programming; andreporting, to a host computing device, an empty page error in responseto the difference value satisfying a threshold criterion.
 17. The systemof claim 16, wherein the arithmetic operation comprises modulo two. 18.The system of claim 16, wherein the operations further comprise, inresponse to the difference value not satisfying the threshold criterion,reporting an uncorrectable data error to the host computing device. 19.The system of claim 16, wherein the first data comprises sub-portions ofdata for each of a lower page (LP), for an upper page (UP), and for anextra page (XP), and the second data comprises data of the top page (TP)programmed during the second pass programming.
 20. The system of claim16, wherein the threshold criterion comprises being less than betweenfive and fifteen percent of a number of bits of the first value.